Ford Fusion 2005 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Fusion is more dynamic to drive. Ford Fusion engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Ford Fusion reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Fusion consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Fusion could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Fusion consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Ford Fusion is larger. Ford Fusion is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fusion is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1175 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Fusion has more luggage capacity. Ford Fusion has 37 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fusion is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`605 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Ford Fusion has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford Fusion, so Ford Fusion quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fusion has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |