Ford Fusion 2002 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 100 HP | 65 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 204 NM | 112 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 15.5 seconds | 10.9 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.7 | 5.1 - 7.9 | |
|
Ford Fusion petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Roomster. On average, Ford Fusion equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
| Ford Fusion is 18 cm shorter than the Skoda Roomster, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fusion is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1175 litres | 1780 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space. Ford Fusion has 113 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Roomster (by 605 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fusion is 0.6 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Ford Fusion can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`623 | ~ 1`721 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fusion has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |