Ford Fusion 2002 vs Mazda 2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 100 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 204 NM | 110 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 15.5 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.7 | 4.5 - 7.1 | |
|
Ford Fusion petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, a Ford Fusion with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Ford Fusion is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Fusion is 10 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Fusion is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1175 litres | 1044 litres | |
|
Ford Fusion has more luggage capacity. Ford Fusion has 70 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fusion (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Fusion is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`623 | ~ 1`512 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Fusion has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |