Ford F150 2020 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 325 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 542 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 144 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 112 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.91 m | 5.23 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 68 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 21 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1495 litres | 1061 litres | |
|
Ford F150 has more luggage capacity. Ford F150 has 434 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`130 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 42 600 | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |