Ford F150 2020 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 597 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 100 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 197 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 7.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.91 m | 5.31 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 60 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 21 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1495 litres | 1061 litres | |
|
Ford F150 has more luggage capacity. Ford F150 has 434 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 45 200 | 27 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |