Ford F150 2011 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 365 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 569 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 112 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 229 NM more than Chrysler 300C. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 11.0 | |
|
The Chrysler 300C is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Ford F150 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 87 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 13 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 42 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`719 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |