Ford F150 2011 vs Toyota Tundra 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 302 HP | 236 HP | |
Torque: | 377 NM | 361 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford F150 engine produces 66 HP more power than Toyota Tundra, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Toyota Tundra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 13.5 | |
The Ford F150 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tundra, which means that by driving the Ford F150 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Ford F150 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.89 m | 5.81 m | |
Width: | 2.01 m | 2.03 m | |
Height: | 1.91 m | 1.94 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Ford F150 is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Tundra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford F150 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 14.3 meters | 13.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Tundra, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`084 | 2`903 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 16 800 | 20 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |