Ford F150 2011 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.9 Petrol | 4.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 360 HP | 295 HP | |
| Torque: | 515 NM | 414 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 65 HP more power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 101 NM more than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 12.2 | |
|
The Chevrolet Tahoe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Tahoe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger, but lower. Ford F150 is 76 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3084 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`719 | 3`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |