Ford F150 2010 vs Chrysler 300C 2006
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 6.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 411 HP | 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 588 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 14 HP less power than Chrysler 300C, but torque is 18 NM more than Chrysler 300C. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 14.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 136 litres | 71 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 87 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 13 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 46 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`493 | 2`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |