Ford F150 2010 vs Chrysler 300C 2006
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 6.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 411 HP | 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 588 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 14 HP less power than Chrysler 300C, but torque is 18 NM more than Chrysler 300C. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 14.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 136 litres | 71 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 2.19 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.99 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 87 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 31 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 51 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 504 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 2.3 metres more than that of the Chrysler 300C, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`311 | 2`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |