Ford F150 2010 vs Toyota Tundra 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 411 HP | 386 HP | |
| Torque: | 588 NM | 544 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 25 HP more power than Toyota Tundra, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Toyota Tundra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 15.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 136 litres | 100 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.19 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.99 m | 1.94 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Tundra, 16 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.3 meters | 13.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Tundra, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`311 kg | 3`221 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`817 kg | 2`477 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 494 kg | 744 kg | |
| Ford F150 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 51 procentiem less than Toyota Tundra. Therefore, Toyota Tundra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |