Ford F150 2010 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.2 Petrol | 6.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 411 HP | 395 HP | |
| Torque: | 588 NM | 565 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 16 HP more power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 136 litres | 98 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 2.19 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.99 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 76 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 19 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 3084 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 2.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`311 kg | 3`311 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`817 kg | 2`522 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 494 kg | 789 kg | |
| Ford F150 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 60 procentiem less than Chevrolet Tahoe. Therefore, Chevrolet Tahoe is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |