Ford F150 2007 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 399 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 55 HP more power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 13.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Ford F150 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 104 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 19 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 32 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1056 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2098 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Blazer, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`130 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |