Ford F150 2003 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 4.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 495 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 96 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 12.6 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger, but slightly lower. Ford F150 is 79 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 1.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`198 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |