Ford F150 2003 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford F150) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 495 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 137 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 152 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 10.4 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 645 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger, but slightly lower. Ford F150 is 83 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 2.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`198 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |