Ford F150 2003 vs Nissan Navara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford F150) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 495 NM | 356 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 156 HP more power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 139 NM more than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 8.1 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 6.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 990 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 46 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 16 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`198 | 2`805 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |