Ford F150 2003 vs Nissan Navara 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 300 HP | 174 HP | |
Torque: | 495 NM | 403 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
Ford F150 engine produces 126 HP more power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 8.5 | |
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 6.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 930 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.68 m | 5.22 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 46 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 15 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 13.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Navara. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`198 | 3`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 000 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |