Ford F150 2003 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 495 NM | 390 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 123 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 11.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 510 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 73 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 2.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`198 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |