Ford F150 2003 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 495 NM | 323 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 93 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 172 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 70 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 61 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 20 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`198 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |