Ford F150 2003 vs Ford F150 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 495 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 2003 engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford F150 2009, but torque is 130 NM more than Ford F150 2009. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 13.7 | |
|
The Ford F150 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 2003 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 2003 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Ford F150 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Ford F150 2003 is 20 cm shorter than the Ford F150 2009, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 2003 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1855 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`198 | 3`221 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Ford F150 has
| |