Ford F150 2003 vs Chevrolet Suburban 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 495 NM | 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 10 HP more power than Chevrolet Suburban, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Chevrolet Suburban. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 117 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 5.57 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger, but lower. Ford F150 is 11 cm longer than the Chevrolet Suburban, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 3720 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`198 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`395 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 803 kg | 890 kg | |
| Ford F150 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Chevrolet Suburban. Therefore, Chevrolet Suburban is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chevrolet Suburban has
| |