Ford F150 2003 vs Chevrolet Colorado 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 495 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 123 HP more power than Chevrolet Colorado, whereas torque is 244 NM more than Chevrolet Colorado. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 10.5 | |
|
The Chevrolet Colorado is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Colorado, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 630 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Ford F150 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.68 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 42 cm longer than the Chevrolet Colorado, 26 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 645 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`198 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chevrolet Colorado has
| |