Ford F150 2003 vs Audi Q7 2006

 
Ford F150
2003 - 2008
Audi Q7
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.4 Petrol3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 300 HP233 HP
Torque: 495 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.1 seconds
Ford F150 engine produces 67 HP more power than Audi Q7, but torque is 5 NM less than Audi Q7.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.710.5
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford F150 consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 630 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 114 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway1200 km on highway
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.68 m5.09 m
Width: 2.00 m1.98 m
Height: 1.87 m1.74 m
Ford F150 is larger.
Ford F150 is 59 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 13 cm higher.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data775 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data775 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2035 litres
Turning diameter: 13.7 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 1.7 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 3`1982`990
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 10 0007600
Pros and Cons: Ford F150 has
  • more power
  • electric power steering
Audi Q7 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv