Ford F150 2003 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005

 
Ford F150
2003 - 2008
Land Rover Range Rover
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.6 Petrol4.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 231 HP306 HP
Torque: 397 NM425 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.7 seconds
Ford F150 engine produces 75 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.714.9
Ford F150 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Ford F150 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 114 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
Ford F150 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.68 m4.95 m
Width: 2.00 m1.96 m
Height: 1.93 m1.82 m
Ford F150 is larger.
Ford F150 is 73 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data535 litres
Turning diameter: 13.7 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 2.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`1303`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 10 0007200
Pros and Cons: Ford F150 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv