Ford F150 2003 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 231 HP | 306 HP | |
Torque: | 397 NM | 425 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Ford F150 engine produces 75 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 14.9 | |
Ford F150 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Ford F150 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 114 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Ford F150 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.68 m | 4.95 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.96 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 73 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford F150 is 2.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Ford F150 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`084 | 3`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 000 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |