Ford F150 2009 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 310 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 365 NM | 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Ford F150 engine produces 130 HP more power than Volkswagen Amarok, but torque is 55 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 8.0 | |
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 6.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 975 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.89 m | 5.25 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 63 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 2`820 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 16 800 | 17 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |