Ford F150 2009 vs Toyota Tundra 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 386 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 544 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 76 HP less power than Toyota Tundra, whereas torque is 179 NM less than Toyota Tundra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 15.3 | |
|
The Ford F150 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tundra, which means that by driving the Ford F150 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Ford F150 is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Tundra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford F150 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.4 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 3`221 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |