Ford F150 2009 vs Toyota Tundra 2013

 
Ford F150
2009 - 2014
Toyota Tundra
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.4 Petrol5.7 Petrol

Performance

Power: 310 HP381 HP
Torque: 365 NM543 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Ford F150 engine produces 71 HP less power than Toyota Tundra, whereas torque is 178 NM less than Toyota Tundra.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.515.7
The Ford F150 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford F150 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tundra, which means that by driving the Ford F150 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 98 litres120 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway910 km on highway
Toyota Tundra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 5.89 m5.81 m
Width: 2.00 m2.03 m
Height: 1.89 m1.93 m
Ford F150 is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Tundra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford F150 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 1572 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1855 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data14.9 meters
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 3`2663`175
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 19 60037 400
Pros and Cons: Ford F150 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • has 4x4 drive
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Toyota Tundra has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • hydraulic power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv