Ford F150 2009 vs Nissan Navara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford F150) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 136 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 38 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 8.5 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 900 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 67 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 15 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.3 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |