Ford F150 2009 vs Nissan Navara 2005

 
Ford F150
2009 - 2014
Nissan Navara
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 5.4 Petrol2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 310 HP174 HP
Torque: 365 NM403 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.4 seconds
Ford F150 engine produces 136 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 38 NM less than Nissan Navara.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.58.5
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford F150 consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 900 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 98 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway1090 km on highway
Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.89 m5.22 m
Width: 2.00 m1.85 m
Height: 1.89 m1.78 m
Ford F150 is larger.
Ford F150 is 67 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 15 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1572 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1855 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data13.3 meters
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 3`2663`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 16 8006000
Pros and Cons: Ford F150 has
  • more power
  • electric power steering
Nissan Navara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv