Ford F150 2009 vs Nissan Navara 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 310 HP | 174 HP | |
Torque: | 365 NM | 403 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
Ford F150 engine produces 136 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 38 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 8.5 | |
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 900 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.89 m | 5.22 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 67 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 15 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 13.3 meters | |
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 3`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 16 800 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |