Ford F150 2009 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford F150) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 79 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 185 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 9.5 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 750 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 49 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 16 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.3 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |