Ford F150 2009 vs Nissan Navara 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 310 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 365 NM | 403 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Ford F150 engine produces 120 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 38 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 8.3 | |
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 6.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 930 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.89 m | 5.22 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 66 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 16 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 13.2 meters | |
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 2`805 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 16 800 | 15 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |