Ford F150 2009 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford F150) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 168 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 402 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 142 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 37 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | no data | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |