Ford F150 2009 vs Mazda CX-9 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 37 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, but torque is 2 NM less than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 12.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Ford F150 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 80 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1572 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 2852 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 997 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 2`062 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |