Ford F150 2009 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford F150) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 167 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 8.9 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 840 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 81 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 29 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 27 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
|
Ford F150 has more luggage capacity. Ford F150 has 72 litres more trunk space than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |