Ford F150 2009 vs Ford Ranger 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 160 HP more power than Ford Ranger, but torque is 10 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 8.5 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 900 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 53 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 15 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | 1210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
|
Ford F150 has more luggage capacity. Ford F150 has 362 litres more trunk space than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 1`144 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 19 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |