Ford F150 2009 vs Ford F150 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 310 HP | 300 HP | |
Torque: | 365 NM | 495 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford F150 2009 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford F150 2003, but torque is 130 NM less than Ford F150 2003. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 | 14.7 | |
Ford F150 2009 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150 2003, which means that by driving the Ford F150 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 114 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Ford F150 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.89 m | 5.68 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.93 m | |
Ford F150 2009 is 20 cm longer than the Ford F150 2003, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 2009 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 13.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`266 | 3`266 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 16 800 | 10 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford F150 has
| |