Ford F150 2009 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 324 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 461 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 14 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 96 NM less than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.7 | 12.7 | |
|
The Chevrolet Tahoe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Tahoe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.96 m | |
| Ford F150 is 76 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 3084 litres | |
| Ford F150 has 1093 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Tahoe. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1229 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | 3`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |