Ford F150 2009 vs Toyota Tundra 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 18 HP less power than Toyota Tundra, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Toyota Tundra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 14.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Ford F150 is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Tundra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford F150 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.4 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 3`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |