Ford F150 2009 vs Ford F150 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 397 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 2009 engine produces 61 HP more power than Ford F150 2003, but torque is 77 NM less than Ford F150 2003. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 14.7 | |
| Ford F150 2009 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150 2003, which means that by driving the Ford F150 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 114 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Ford F150 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.68 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.93 m | |
| Ford F150 2009 is 20 cm longer than the Ford F150 2003, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 2009 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 3`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Ford F150 has
| |