Ford F150 2009 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 295 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 414 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 3 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 94 NM less than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 12.2 | |
|
The Chevrolet Tahoe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Tahoe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.96 m | |
| Ford F150 is 76 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | 3084 litres | |
| Ford F150 has 1093 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Tahoe. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Tahoe (by 1229 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 3`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |