Ford F150 2009 vs Toyota Tundra 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 248 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 294 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 62 HP less power than Toyota Tundra, whereas torque is 166 NM less than Toyota Tundra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 13.1 | |
|
The Toyota Tundra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tundra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 98 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Tundra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.94 m | |
| Ford F150 is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Tundra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford F150 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1572 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1855 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.4 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`084 | 3`039 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |