Ford F150 2017 vs Toyota Tundra 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 395 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 542 NM | 443 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 85 HP more power than Toyota Tundra, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Toyota Tundra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 14.7 | |
|
The Ford F150 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tundra, which means that by driving the Ford F150 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 120 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Tundra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.93 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford F150 is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Tundra, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford F150 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2192 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 38 800 | 34 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |