Ford F150 2017 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018

 
Ford F150
2017 - 2020
Mitsubishi L 200
2018 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.7 Petrol2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 325 HP181 HP
Torque: 542 NM430 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Ford F150 engine produces 144 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 112 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.28.6
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford F150 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 390 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 87 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway960 km on highway
Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 292 mm (11.5 inches)205 mm (8.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford F150 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 5.89 m5.23 m
Width: 2.03 m1.82 m
Height: 1.92 m1.80 m
Ford F150 is larger.
Ford F150 is 67 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 21 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 12 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 2192 litres1061 litres
Ford F150 has more luggage capacity.
Ford F150 has 1131 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi L 200.
Turning diameter: no data11.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 38 80030 000
Pros and Cons: Ford F150 has
  • more power
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv