Ford F150 2017 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 325 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 542 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 94 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 8 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.5 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 49 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 18 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2192 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.3 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 55 000 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |