Ford F150 2017 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 325 HP | 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 542 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 144 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 112 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 292 mm (11.5 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford F150 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford F150 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Ford F150 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.23 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 67 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 21 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2192 litres | 1061 litres | |
|
Ford F150 has more luggage capacity. Ford F150 has 1131 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 55 000 | 32 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |