Ford F150 2017 vs Ford Ranger 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 325 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 542 NM | 375 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Ford F150 engine produces 175 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 167 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.5 | |
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.89 m | 5.36 m | |
Width: | 2.03 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.92 m | 1.82 m | |
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 53 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 18 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 2192 litres | 1210 litres | |
Ford F150 has more luggage capacity. Ford F150 has 982 litres more trunk space than the Ford Ranger. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`144 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 38 800 | 19 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |