Ford F150 2014 vs Chevrolet Suburban 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.9 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 385 HP | 324 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 61 HP more power than Chevrolet Suburban, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Chevrolet Suburban. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 12.9 | |
| Ford F150 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Suburban, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 117 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Suburban gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.65 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.95 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger, but slightly lower. Ford F150 is 24 cm longer than the Chevrolet Suburban, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1495 litres | 1297 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2200 litres | 3890 litres | |
| Ford F150 has 198 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Suburban. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Suburban (by 1690 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`266 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Chevrolet Suburban has
| |