Ford F150 2014 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford F150) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 325 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 508 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 94 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 42 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 9.5 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 49 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 18 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1495 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.3 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |