Ford F150 2014 vs Ford Ranger 2015

 
Ford F150
2014 - 2017
Ford Ranger
2015 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.7 Petrol3.2 Diesel
Petrol engines (Ford F150) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 325 HP200 HP
Torque: 508 NM470 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.6 seconds
Ford F150 engine produces 125 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Ford Ranger.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.88.9
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford F150 consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 435 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 87 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway1080 km on highway
Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.89 m5.36 m
Width: 2.03 m1.86 m
Height: 1.92 m1.82 m
Ford F150 is larger.
Ford F150 is 53 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 17 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1495 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2200 litresno data
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): no data3`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 28 80031 800
Pros and Cons: Ford F150 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Ford Ranger has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv