Ford F150 2014 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 325 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 508 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Ford F150 engine produces 125 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.7 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford F150 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford F150 could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.89 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Ford F150 is larger. Ford F150 is 53 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 17 cm wider, while the height of Ford F150 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1495 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 800 | 35 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford F150 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |